First
Presbyterian Church of
Mark 10 and Philippians 3
“Whose Slave are
You?”
The Rev. Dr. Fred G. Garry
Dunlap, Macintosh,
and Goodyear. These might be the
clues of a "Jeopardy" question.
"Who are men that invented products using rubber in the 19th
century, Alex?" I feel so smart
when I know things like that. As I was reading Adam Hoschschild’s King Leopold’s Ghost if felt like I was
building an arsenal of interesting facts to win the next time I played Trivial
Pursuit. With each page I could
imagine smiling when the final Jeopardy category was 19th century
For instance the title, King Leopold’s Ghost, I had never
connected the dots of this man to the Belgium Congo, to the adventurer Stanley,
to the failed Mexican monarchy of Maximillian and
Carlotta, let alone the manufacturing revolution that emerged with the use of
rubber products before reading this book.
Now, the connections are very, very clear.
Before reading this, I had no idea
that rubber grew in vine form as well as a tree. I’ve actually seen rubber plantations in
The story of Leopold II who felt
terribly incomplete without an empire to match his royal counter parts in
France and England, how he created a society to foster the end of slavery,
convinced the world he was on a mission to set up a “free state” in Africa, and
boondoggled everyone. Leopold the II of
Belgium simply hoodwinked the well intended of the world and ended up with a
colonial empire of massive size and scope.
He convened international conferences, gave out medals to those trying
to aid Africa and the world applauded him as his agents forced village after
village into slavery to build railroads and collect ivory. Yet, this was small scale before rubber.
Had
the industrial use of rubber products not occurred at just the right time I
think Leopold could have explained away the abuses, yet, at the end of the
twenty year rubber boom, with the all wild profits reaped and the world’s
attention brought to bear by crusading journalists and missionaries it was even
beyond Leopold’s control to explain away 10 million dead. In order to harvest the rubber vines in the
But
there was a real motivation for this.
When discoveries and inventions enabled the use of rubber, making it a
catalyst for manufacturing, it became clear that it would take twenty years to
grow plantations where the rubber trees could be tapped like maples and their
harvesting would be more predictable and economical. In this twenty year gap Leopold recognized
that in the
Now
Leopold did achieve a great fortune, build fabulous parks and royal halls and
provide the
Leopold
is certainly not solitary as an empire builder whose haste kept up a breakneck
speed at the expense of millions. His
haste, though, is perhaps the most transparent.
For it was really clear, the twenty years that is, which drove the vine
harvesting, drove the brutal slavery, drove the decimation of the Congo. A real decision was made: do whatever it
takes to get as much as you can.
As
fate would have it I started another book the same time I was reading Hochshild’s Leopold’s
Ghost. This second book was 180
degrees from the story of the rubber boom in the
I
tried to stop reading this book as I needed to focus on the story of Leopold
for an upcoming forum, but I couldn’t.
And I couldn’t help but feel they formed a strange compliment in
contrast. For on the one hand in the
Leopold story was the most transparent picture of haste, of ambition fueled
with technological advance and the destruction it brought, and on the other
hand was a very clear image of what happens when you don’t get caught up, when
you are not fueled by haste. Even though
one was a historical description of
It
was truly a matter of a few moments before Brende and
his wife saw this. Almost walking on the
farm they felt the haste of their lives called into check by the absence of
electricity and the way life gets slowed down without a car. All of sudden things were moving much
slower. And yet, they weren’t standing
around. The couple of suburbanites from
Yet,
as hard as it was, Brende’s conclusion dripped from
every page: he felt better off. He soon
lost the extra pounds he carried and gained a great appetite. The rhythms of the sun and moon and the seasons
became his first glimpse of real time.
He really had to plant at a certain time, harvest at the right time,
pull weeds before it rained, milk the cows before they burst, eat when the food
was cooked. Where conversations were to
be had or not before, now his neighbors’ words were his television and radio
and church was a gathering of a community and not the choice he made for
spiritual growth.
Although
I did find myself wanting to garden more after reading Brende’s
book, I wasn’t ready to go Amish. And
neither was he. After a year and half Brende and his wife and new born daughter while not ready
to go Amish were ready to live without haste.
To live recognizing that with every piece of technology we picked up we
gave away some freedom, with every convenience we lost a part of our soul. And this is true.
What
Leopold story offered as a kind of morality tale to the nth degree, Brende’s was a quiet suggestion that there are other
choices than wringing our hands in collective guilt simply feeling trapped.
How
fast do we live, believe we must live?
None of us are destroying the
While
Brende found all the human foibles that dog the human
soul living amongst the Amish, they were all there; he found them not in the
newspaper, but in the conversations and life together. He didn’t find them in the tabloids or Dr.
Phil, but on his porch and barn raising. Here, instead of being a something he could
turn off or change the channel, they were his to keep. People living without haste, it turns out,
live together.
When
James and John say let us sit at your right and left, this has traditionally
and perhaps correctly been interpreted as a warning against ambition. Don’t seek to be more than you are, be
humble, be a servant.
And that is not bad advice. When
Leopold wanted an empire he wanted to sit at the right hand as it were, he
wanted to be a big dog. The story of
James and John’s request is just as transparent as Leopold. Yet, it leaves the impression that the only
alternative to ambition, to haste as it were, is a kind of quiet, docile,
submission of slavery.
I
hear this voice when I am knee deep in an effort, a project. I hear the voices saying for whose glory are you
working? And we should hear this voice. We should look to our life and wonder for
what end are we striving? Yet, the
alternative to doing too much or being ambitious, being driven by haste is not
doing nothing.
Listen
to Paul. He says, I was ambitious, my
life was haste. And then I put that
aside and now I am striving toward one purpose, one calling, one
goal. Forgetting what lies behind I
press on. This is something Brende found among the Amish. The opposite of haste wasn’t inertia or abandoning
the soul’s need to strive; it was to find the right direction. We should be working hard, playing hard, and
loving life; we should be doing these things with zest. Yet our lives should be moving in a direction
that calls us to worship, brings us close to our family, let’s us know
peace.
When
Paul said, I am pressing on he was in prison.
This wasn’t a career change he was talking about or a promotion like
James and John were looking for. He was
forging ahead toward a life of peace and purpose.
Now,
when I look out here I am not finding a lot of Leopolds
and would never suggest we turn Amish.
As little style as I possess I want buttons and a shave. Yet, I can’t help but give pause when I hear
people say their lives are too busy for worship. With all the opulence we possess I am struck
by my desire for more as a sin. Do we
want more things more than we want to know Christ?
Again,
I don’t see Leopolds in the pews or the mirror, but I
do see haste in my heart. Do you see
haste? Can you hear it when you say
things like I just couldn’t go to church I was too tired. Can you hear it when you think of your pledge
and believe a tithe is beyond a possibility?
What if the haste that takes away from worship from faithful stewardship
from our families and our community is not worth it?
No
one will ever look at Leopold’s castles and parks and say the 10 million
Congolese lives lost were a worthy sacrifice.
Yet why do we look at our life without a devotion to prayer, without a
Sunday rest, without faithful stewardship, without forgiveness and peace, why
do we look at these and say our haste was worth it?
It’s
not. Keep your electricity, but stop
watching hours upon hours of television and yet feel put upon coming to worship
for an hour. Keep your phone, but invite
your neighbor to worship. Keep your car,
but walk your street in prayer, hoping for the families that they will find a
life without haste. Keep your portfolios,
but know that if you gain the world but lose your soul, it didn’t work out
quite right.
When
Paul said the former things are trash to me, he meant the life gained in
haste. He didn’t put haste aside and
become complacent; he put it aside so he could truly run, truly strive toward
the